Part II, Deep Dive
Capital Improvement Program (FY27, 31)
The five-year capital plan the Young administration wants Council to approve, including the single largest discretionary technology line in the book with no charter, scope, or vendor on the record.
Briefing p. 38
What the CIP funds
The five-year CIP totals $813,553,092 (FY27, 31) across four categories. The administration asks Council to approve multi-year capital commitments now, in many cases without the basic project documentation Council needs to evaluate whether the spending is necessary, well-designed, or likely to succeed.
- ,Infrastructure: streets, drainage, utilities.
- ,Facilities: buildings, parks, and public spaces.
- ,Technology: IT systems and digital infrastructure.
- ,Equipment: vehicles, machinery, and fleet replacement.
Key finding: Smart City (IT01009), $12,731,044 over FY27, 30
The 901 Report reviewed all available CIP documentation for the Smart City line. Five basic deliverables Council would expect for any $12M project are missing from the record.
- ,No project charter: no document defining purpose, objectives, or success criteria.
- ,No scope definition: no description of what Smart City actually includes, sensors, networks, applications?
- ,No vendor selection: no identified vendors and no competitive procurement process on the record.
- ,No deliverables timeline: no schedule showing when components are delivered or implemented.
- ,No success metrics: no measurable outcomes for Council to evaluate effectiveness.
The Council's choice
Council faces a clear choice on the IT capital picture: approve $12.7M for an undefined Smart City line while the 3-1-1 constituent service system runs on 10, 11 year old unsupported SeeClickFix software, or defer Smart City until it is properly defined and prioritize modernizing the systems Memphis residents actually touch every day, 3-1-1, business permits, online payments.
What deferred Smart City dollars could fund instead
The same $12.7M, redirected to documented needs, would close real, named gaps that already have engineering studies and resident demand behind them.
- ,Cordova drainage: $3M, $5M.
- ,Library technology refresh: $2M, $3M.
- ,Orange Mound housing: $2M, $3M.
- ,Public Works equipment and preventive maintenance: balance of the redirect.
Engineering oversight constraint
City Engineer's budget is falling 4.1% while the five-year CIP grows to $813.6M. Engineering oversight capacity per CIP dollar is decreasing at the same time the capital portfolio is expanding, raising the risk of cost overruns, design errors, and construction-quality issues across the entire CIP, not just Smart City.
Before the June 9 vote
- 1.Defer the $12.7M Smart City CIP until a project charter is approved with scope, vendors, deliverables, timeline, and success metrics.
- 2.Require every CIP project over $1M to include a charter, cost-benefit analysis, alternatives analysis, and implementation plan.
- 3.Prioritize infrastructure projects with completed engineering studies over speculative technology projects.
- 4.Redirect deferred Smart City funds to documented needs (Cordova drainage, library tech refresh, Orange Mound housing).
During FY27 implementation
- 1.Quarterly CIP status reports: project progress, spending vs. budget, schedule, and risks.
- 2.Quarterly engineering-oversight reports showing reviews completed and issues identified.
Approving $813M over five years without basic project documentation isn't oversight, it's hope. The Young administration has the burden of producing the documents.
Source: CITY OF MEMPHIS FY2027 BUDGET COMPREHENSIVE INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS, Part II, p. 38.
Read the full briefing
Every page. Every citation. Delivered to Memphis City Council.
More from this topic
Recent budget and city spending coverage from the newsroom.
- Memphis Moved $7.09 Million Out of a Bus Rapid Transit Line and Into Buses, Trolley Track and Paratransit Vans.MATA has received 12 of 56 buses and needs the city's local share by August 25 to pay for them. The money for all of it comes out of capital already appropriated for the Innovation Corridor and transit amenities.
- Memphis Has Never Funded Its Own Violence Intervention Work. The State Money That Does Ends July 1, 2027.Two organizations told the Council on August 18 that the city is a pass-through, not a funder. One operates on $739,000. Both asked for $2 million each and $10 million for the city office that coordinates them.
- Memphis Council Members Got a List of Where the Next Surveillance Cameras Go and Three Days to Object.The committee chairman told colleagues the locations were chosen from data, not out of a hat, and asked for responses by Friday, August 21. The list was not read into the record, is not attached to the published agenda, and no member asked for it to be released.
- Memphis Extended a Pension Increase to 911 Dispatchers and Paramedics in About Sixty Seconds. The Liability Is $973,000.The amendment raises the multiplier from 2.25 percent to 2.50 percent and removes a 5 percent early retirement penalty. The cost is charged to a fund created by a 2019 sales tax referendum, with an automatic step-down if that fund cannot carry it.
- Memphis Told the Council Its Sewer Fund Was $13 Million in the Hole. The Rating Agency Had Already Cut It.S&P lowered the sewer revenue rating to A from A+ on July 14 with a negative outlook. On August 18 the Chief Financial Officer told a Council committee the system was carrying a negative claim on cash of about $13 million, one month after a $37 million interfund rescue.
- Memphis Approved $3.1 Million for Jesse Turner Park. The Resolution's First Line Names a Different Park.The money funds a partnership with LeMoyne-Owen College athletics, including indoor tennis courts, an expanded pro shop with locker rooms and a turf field. The project still has no CIP number, and the filed resolution opens by citing Glenview Park Aquatic Facility.